Your Career... With a Vision!

Guidance for a successful, healthy, and fulfilling career.

Higher Attrition Expected in the Workplace

Print the article

This entry was posted on 1/27/2008 4:23 PM and is filed under uncategorized.

I was reading the McKinsey Quarterly today and found a fascinating study by 3 principle consultants. It was a follow-up to the “War for Talent” research completed by McKinsey in 1997. McKinsey indicates that “…finding talented people [is] likely to be the single most important managerial preoccupation for the rest of this decade.” “People in this group see their professional careers as a series of two-to-three-year chapters and will readily switch jobs, so companies face the risk of high attrition if their expectations aren’t met.” To me, this is not surprising. Richard Florida, Penelope Trunk and many other experts have shown that Gen Y has a new set of requirements for personal fulfillment in our work life. The great news is that frontline business analysts like McKinsey are beginning to recognize this.

McKinsey mentions “To a considerable extent, executives must blame themselves for their current talent woes.” “Since investments in talent intangibles are expensed rather than capitalized, managers may try to raise short-term earnings by cutting discretionary expenditures on people development.” I think this shows some of the ties to Wall Street that can severely harm long-term corporate performance. High turnover hurts corporate performance but is tougher to quantify than direct training expenses. How do you quantify the cost of on the job training from year to year because your employees keep leaving?

Knowing this, executives can utilize this information and improve their respected organizations by potentially measuring their HR managers or line managers on talent retention (not only operating profit or jobs filled). My calculus professor once said "Assessment drives performance." Talent retention assessment could help include the focus on long-term performance in addition to quarterly or even monthly operating performance. Executives could also offer incentives for employees to move around within their current company if they choose to do so. The younger generation values career freedom, so while seemingly counter-intuitive, this could help increase profitability in the long term by decreasing employee turnover.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 2/3/2008 11:25 AM Jeremy wrote:
      I agree with all that. The company I work for has people who have been working at the same company for 20, 15, 10 and even 5 years, and I'm like: "Whhaaaat? How is that possible? What has kept them there so long?"

      I'm part of the new generation of workers... and 5 years seems like a lifetime for me. I'm not interested in doing the same thing for so long, and I get "bored" easily (which doesn't detract from my quality of work, but instead always means I have my ears and eyes open constantly for new activities at work while thinking about how I can transition in to other roles).

      The company I currently work at allows people to move fairly easily out of departments and into new roles, provides money for outside education, and does a pretty good job of long term planning and vision. And yet I'm still feeling the way I do.

      Most likely, I'm not the only one out there who feels this way... and I wonder what it means for our world.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.